By Derek Rosen, guest columnist
As many of you by now know, the city council is in the process of banning pitbulls, thanks mainly to the efforts, testimony, and countless letters-to-the-editor of Jason Freidmann. Well, I read in my paper this morning that last night an assailant broke into the Freidmans' home, robbing and then shooting Jason. It is not yet clear whether he will survive. Call me crazy, but I can't think of anyone who deserved it more.
Had Jason, who is a Jew, had a pitbull, there is no way the assailant could have gotten away with it. There is no doubt about that. My pitbull, Fitzy, would have made short work of the burgler.
Many of you who agree with me will only charge that it is too soon, and that his family members need time to grieve. This I contest! Was it too soon after the September 11th terrorist acts to go after Osama Bin Laden? To soon after Pearl Harbor to go after Hitler? No! Surely not, sir.
Others of you will say I am biased, as Jason would've taken Fitzy away. This is maybe true, but a better way to look at it is that Jason was biased. Jason, who is Jewish, has had it in for me, and other pitbull owners, ever since Fitzy mauled his five year old son Jonah as the Freidman's were walking through the park a short distance away from a dog fight Fitzy had just WON. First of all, if Jonah is such a pussy, Jason shouldn't even take him outside. My son Buck knows that if a pitbull runs up to you, you just hit it on its nose. Maybe if Jason had been a responsible parent and not raised such a pussy for a son, Jonah wouldn't have such a fucking ugly and scarred face. No, it was not Fitzy's fault. Not indeed.
To quote Thomas Jefferson, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Truer words have never been spoken. May Jason Freidman rot in hell.
NB: Derek would like to thank LMAODOGZ!?! for publishing his editorial after it was rejected from the Tribune.
